![]() ![]() ![]() Instead we decided to continue the “communications” as a form of a controlled experiment in “superluminal thought transfer” - even if it was clear that the term should be considered as a tentative indication of only one out several possible interpretations. That is why we did not dismiss the “ we are you in the future” as impossible and therefore ignorable. The more improbable is a given phenomenon, the more information is carried by its occurrence, the more we can learn by its study. Improbable perhaps is the right word, but there are many things that are improbable and yet happen. On the other hand, from the theoretical papers published in physics journals we can learn that, with a proper and careful interpretation, and taking into account quantum uncertainties, communication into the past cannot be dismissed as impossible. ![]() When interpreting “ we are you in the future” in an oversimplified way, we are faced with causal paradoxes. The source identified itself by saying “ we are you in the future.” Modern physics does not provide us with practical means for this type of communication, and theories on this subject are not well developed they are, in fact, inconclusive and controversial. The name “Cassiopaea” was given by a consciously “channeled source” which Laura accessed in 1994 after two years of experimental work. Laura is married to theoretical/mathematical physicist Arkadiusz Jadczyk who introduces his wife’s work in the following extract: Welcome to the Cassiopaean Website, the repository for the work of scientific mystic, Laura Knight-Jadczyk. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |